J. Clarke
To Win
TBD
To Win
Jay Clarke vs Daniel Bagnolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W W
Form
L L L L L W L W L WH2H: Clarke 1 - 0 Bagnolini
They have played 2 sets in total, with Clarke winning 2 and Bagnolini winning 0. The last match between Clarke and Bagnolini was at the M25 Reggio Emilia, 18-05-2023, Second, Clay with Jay Clarke getting the victory 6-2 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jay Clarke | 1 |
| Daniel Bagnolini | 0 |
M25 Reggio Emilia(18-05-2023)
6
2
3
0
| Clarke | Stats | Bagnolini |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (28-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (3-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 251 | Ranking | 893 |
| 153 | Highest Rank | 873 |
| 26 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 15 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (325-229) | Career Total W/L | 53% (75-67) |
| $156,120 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
Clarke VS TBD
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
21 Apr 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Jay Clarke
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
83%
(
33 of
40)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
45
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 2 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:48:0 | Average Match Time | 0:48:0 |
| 55% (17/31) | 1st Serve % | 83% (33/40) |
| 88% (15/17) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 64% (9/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (21/40) | Return Points Win % | 23% (7/31) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Arthur Gea
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Federico Iannaccone
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Federico Bondioli
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Jay Clarke
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
40%
(
10 of
25)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
11 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33
Total Points Won
22
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Chirag Duhan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Karan Singh
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Grigoriy Lomakin
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kabir Hans
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Bagnolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giuseppe La Vela
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (325/229) | Win/Loss | 53% (75/67) |
| 57% (723/554) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (163/153) |
| 53% (6310/5695) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1406/1395) |
| 60% (130/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (13/13) |
| 67% (151/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (61/53) |
| 46% (33/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 26% (11/31) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1666 | Aces Total | 46 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1236 | Total Double Faults | 276 |
| 1:37:26 | Average Match Time | 1:4:25 |
| 470.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.7 |
| 58% (20936/36142) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3645/5433) |
| 68% (14307/20936) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2205/3645) |
| 51% (7789/15206) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (832/1788) |
| 44% (1698/3821) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (282/607) |
| 41% (14978/36427) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2299/5444) |
| 23% (5/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 27% (4/11) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (121/129) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 73% (194/70) | Futures W/L | 53% (75/66) |
| 59% (318/535) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (74/140) |
| 25% (3/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (86/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (12/23) |
| 57% (91/161) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 86% (324/279) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (68/64) |
| 14% (324/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (68/4) |
| 20% (230/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (74/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
